+60.8%
EEM vs GLDM
+105.8%
-45.0%
-18.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.8% | +0.8% | -6.6% | -6.1% |
| 7D | -7.4% | +1.9% | -9.3% | -8.1% |
| 30D | -15.0% | -1.7% | -13.3% | -14.5% |
| 3M | -11.7% | -3.5% | -8.1% | -10.6% |
| 6M | -10.8% | -10.1% | -0.7% | -7.5% |
| YTD | +6.7% | -5.0% | +11.7% | +8.3% |
| 1Y | +7.4% | +2.8% | +4.6% | +6.1% |
| All | +60.8% | +105.8% | -45.0% | +17.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling