+85.9%
EEM vs FROG
+218.8%
-132.8%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -1.7% | +2.9% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -0.5% | -0.8% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +2.1% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +1.8% |
| 3M | +1.0% | +11.1% | -10.1% | 0.0% |
| 6M | +15.9% | +108.3% | -92.4% | +9.8% |
| YTD | +24.6% | +39.6% | -14.9% | +20.7% |
| 1Y | +32.3% | +74.7% | -42.5% | +25.3% |
| 3Y | +85.9% | +224.1% | -138.2% | +59.9% |
| All | +85.9% | +218.8% | -132.8% | +59.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling