+85.9%
EEM vs AZO
+10.0%
+75.9%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -0.2% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -3.6% | +2.3% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -5.6% | +7.6% | +2.2% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -6.6% | +7.7% | +1.2% |
| 6M | +15.9% | -22.5% | +38.4% | +17.9% |
| YTD | +24.6% | -15.2% | +39.8% | +26.0% |
| 1Y | +32.3% | -33.9% | +66.2% | +37.0% |
| 3Y | +85.9% | +11.8% | +74.1% | +80.8% |
| All | +85.9% | +10.0% | +75.9% | +80.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling