+37.2%
ECHO vs TMF
-22.6%
+59.8%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.9% | +0.1% | +6.9% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +6.7% | +16.3% | -9.6% | +3.6% |
| 3M | +12.4% | -2.7% | +15.1% | +14.6% |
| 6M | -20.4% | -13.2% | -7.2% | -16.7% |
| YTD | -6.9% | -16.7% | +9.8% | -0.6% |
| All | +37.2% | -22.6% | +59.8% | +43.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling