+407.1%
ECHO vs RF
+86.8%
+320.3%
-50.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | RF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.1% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -3.6% | +6.0% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +8.1% | -36.0% | -31.6% |
| 6M | -21.2% | +11.5% | -32.7% | -27.0% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +15.6% | -33.0% | -26.3% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | +15.7% | +17.9% | +18.8% |
| All | +407.1% | +86.8% | +320.3% | +227.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling