+283.1%
ECHO vs PLTU
+154.0%
+129.1%
-48.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -9.0% | +9.0% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -13.6% | +17.0% | +4.9% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +16.7% | -14.3% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +29.6% | -57.5% | -32.0% |
| 6M | -21.2% | -0.1% | -21.1% | -24.6% |
| YTD | -17.4% | -31.5% | +14.1% | -18.6% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | -19.7% | +53.3% | +28.3% |
| All | +283.1% | +154.0% | +129.1% | +194.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling