+33.9%
ECHO vs PENG
+88.9%
-55.0%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.2% | +12.4% | -7.2% | +3.0% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -19.4% | +17.1% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -3.1% | -42.4% | +39.2% | +5.0% |
| 3M | +8.7% | -25.6% | +34.4% | +12.9% |
| 6M | -24.8% | +7.3% | -32.0% | -29.1% |
| YTD | -13.0% | +113.9% | -126.8% | -32.8% |
| 1Y | +33.9% | +93.6% | -59.6% | +5.4% |
| All | +33.9% | +88.9% | -55.0% | +5.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling