-16.9%
ECHO vs OSCR
+132.2%
-149.1%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | OSCR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -3.8% | +1.5% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +5.3% | +4.7% | +0.6% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +14.8% | -12.3% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +16.7% | -38.5% | -24.6% |
| 6M | -16.9% | +127.5% | -144.4% | -26.2% |
| All | -16.9% | +132.2% | -149.1% | -26.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside OSCR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus OSCR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × OSCR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded OSCR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling