+37.2%
ECHO vs NIO
-51.1%
+88.3%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.9% | +0.6% | +6.4% | +6.9% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +6.9% | -3.9% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +6.7% | -4.7% | +11.4% | +7.2% |
| 3M | +12.4% | -28.1% | +40.4% | +16.1% |
| 6M | -20.4% | -41.7% | +21.3% | -16.2% |
| YTD | -6.9% | -33.1% | +26.2% | +1.9% |
| All | +37.2% | -51.1% | +88.3% | +72.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling