+949.3%
ECHO vs LEN
-23.4%
+972.7%
-48.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -0.4% | -1.5% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -6.4% | +10.0% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +7.5% | +15.6% | -8.2% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +16.2% | -0.8% | +16.9% | +15.5% |
| 6M | -20.9% | +0.4% | -21.2% | -21.6% |
| YTD | -6.0% | -14.1% | +8.2% | -3.5% |
| 1Y | +43.4% | -29.6% | +73.0% | +55.5% |
| All | +949.3% | -23.4% | +972.7% | +716.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling