-21.2%
ECHO vs LDOS
-25.9%
+4.7%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.5% | -0.5% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -5.4% | +8.8% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +4.9% | -2.5% | +1.2% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +7.2% | -35.1% | -29.2% |
| 6M | -21.2% | -24.2% | +3.0% | -19.8% |
| All | -21.2% | -25.9% | +4.7% | -19.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling