-28.0%
ECHO vs GTLB
+59.0%
-86.9%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.1% | -1.0% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +11.1% | -7.6% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +37.8% | -35.4% | -2.9% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +61.6% | -89.5% | -34.0% |
| All | -28.0% | +59.0% | -86.9% | -34.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling