+20.9%
ECHO vs FLNC
+46.9%
-26.0%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | +2.5% | -1.1% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -4.1% | +7.8% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +0.7% | -24.8% | +25.5% | +3.2% |
| 3M | -27.3% | -59.1% | +31.8% | -22.3% |
| 6M | -17.0% | -42.0% | +25.0% | -13.9% |
| YTD | -14.3% | -49.8% | +35.5% | -10.4% |
| 1Y | +20.9% | +43.1% | -22.2% | +14.6% |
| All | +20.9% | +46.9% | -26.0% | +14.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling