+407.1%
ECHO vs DOC
+20.8%
+386.3%
-50.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.8% | +1.8% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -1.5% | +4.9% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -4.8% | +7.1% | +4.8% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +6.9% | -34.8% | -30.9% |
| 6M | -21.2% | +20.7% | -42.0% | -29.9% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +34.1% | -51.5% | -31.4% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | +22.6% | +10.9% | +16.3% |
| All | +407.1% | +20.8% | +386.3% | +377.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling