+412.3%
ECHO vs DAR
+13.3%
+399.0%
-50.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DAR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.9% | +0.9% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +1.4% | +2.1% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +12.8% | -10.4% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +7.4% | -35.3% | -29.9% |
| 6M | -21.2% | +22.3% | -43.5% | -27.0% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +81.1% | -98.5% | -33.1% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | +106.5% | -72.9% | +1.7% |
| All | +412.3% | +13.3% | +399.0% | +396.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DAR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DAR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DAR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DAR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling