+43.4%
ECHO vs CSGP
-55.2%
+98.5%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CSGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -0.2% | -1.7% | -1.9% |
| 7D | +3.6% | -7.1% | +10.7% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +7.5% | +3.6% | +3.8% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +16.2% | -2.7% | +18.9% | +15.9% |
| 6M | -20.9% | -8.0% | -12.8% | -20.4% |
| YTD | -6.0% | -55.0% | +49.0% | +20.5% |
| 1Y | +43.4% | -55.8% | +99.1% | +86.1% |
| All | +43.4% | -55.2% | +98.5% | +86.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CSGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CSGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CSGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CSGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling