+407.1%
ECHO vs CMS
+36.5%
+370.6%
-50.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.2% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +3.4% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -3.6% | +6.0% | +2.9% |
| 3M | -28.0% | -1.9% | -26.0% | -28.1% |
| 6M | -21.2% | -11.0% | -10.3% | -19.5% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +0.2% | -17.6% | -18.2% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | -1.3% | +34.9% | +32.4% |
| All | +407.1% | +36.5% | +370.6% | +290.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling