-3.3%
EBAY vs UMC
+9.4%
-12.7%
-14.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +5.1% | -3.9% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +6.6% | -7.0% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -6.3% | +16.6% | -22.9% | -5.9% |
| 3M | -3.3% | +11.0% | -14.3% | -1.9% |
| All | -3.3% | +9.4% | -12.7% | -1.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling