+12.6%
EBAY vs UMC
+209.4%
-196.9%
-20.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +4.6% | -6.9% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +5.0% | -7.0% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -6.7% | +7.7% | -14.4% | -6.6% |
| 3M | -5.0% | +1.7% | -6.6% | -5.3% |
| 6M | +14.6% | +113.9% | -99.3% | +13.4% |
| YTD | +19.8% | +168.9% | -149.1% | +21.5% |
| 1Y | +12.6% | +207.2% | -194.6% | +10.5% |
| All | +12.6% | +209.4% | -196.9% | +10.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling