+160.3%
EBAY vs TTWO
+50.8%
+109.5%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TTWO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -0.7% | +3.3% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +0.4% | +3.8% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +5.6% | -11.3% | +17.0% | +8.4% |
| 3M | -1.4% | +1.6% | -3.0% | -2.0% |
| 6M | +18.2% | +2.1% | +16.1% | +17.1% |
| YTD | +24.8% | -15.8% | +40.7% | +27.2% |
| 1Y | +18.0% | -12.6% | +30.6% | +19.3% |
| 3Y | +160.3% | +48.2% | +112.1% | +136.6% |
| All | +160.3% | +50.8% | +109.5% | +136.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TTWO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TTWO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TTWO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TTWO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling