+67.7%
EBAY vs PLTU
+154.0%
-86.3%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -9.0% | +6.7% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -13.6% | +11.5% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -6.7% | +16.7% | -23.3% | -7.6% |
| 3M | -5.0% | +29.6% | -34.5% | -7.2% |
| 6M | +14.6% | -0.1% | +14.7% | +12.6% |
| YTD | +19.8% | -31.5% | +51.3% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +12.6% | -19.7% | +32.3% | +10.8% |
| All | +67.7% | +154.0% | -86.3% | +58.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling