+153.1%
EBAY vs NIO
-62.3%
+215.4%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.3% | +1.4% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -6.7% | +6.3% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -6.3% | -20.0% | +13.7% | -4.8% |
| 3M | -3.3% | -30.5% | +27.2% | -0.6% |
| 6M | +13.5% | -20.7% | +34.2% | +14.9% |
| YTD | +21.2% | -25.7% | +46.9% | +23.1% |
| 1Y | +13.9% | -38.6% | +52.4% | +17.1% |
| 3Y | +153.1% | -62.3% | +215.3% | +163.5% |
| All | +153.1% | -62.3% | +215.4% | +163.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling