+160.3%
EBAY vs MTZ
+160.5%
-0.2%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +3.5% | -0.9% | +2.3% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +1.4% | +2.8% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +5.6% | -14.5% | +20.1% | +7.0% |
| 3M | -1.4% | -32.9% | +31.5% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +18.2% | -20.8% | +39.1% | +18.9% |
| YTD | +24.8% | +10.6% | +14.2% | +20.5% |
| 1Y | +18.0% | +27.1% | -9.1% | +12.2% |
| 3Y | +160.3% | +166.1% | -5.9% | +111.5% |
| All | +160.3% | +160.5% | -0.2% | +111.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling