+153.7%
EBAY vs LCID
-93.0%
+246.6%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -2.1% | +3.6% | +1.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -9.1% | +8.3% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -0.6% | -37.6% | +37.0% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -1.0% | -11.1% | +10.1% | -1.5% |
| 6M | +16.3% | -59.2% | +75.4% | +21.2% |
| YTD | +21.7% | -60.5% | +82.1% | +26.8% |
| 1Y | +16.5% | -78.5% | +95.0% | +25.6% |
| All | +153.7% | -93.0% | +246.6% | +196.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling