+55.4%
EBAY vs KRMN
+14.6%
+40.7%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -2.4% | +3.8% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -15.1% | +14.3% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -0.6% | -44.5% | +43.9% | +5.4% |
| 3M | -1.0% | -25.0% | +24.0% | +1.0% |
| 6M | +16.3% | -66.5% | +82.8% | +29.5% |
| YTD | +21.7% | -53.0% | +74.7% | +30.8% |
| 1Y | +16.5% | -44.7% | +61.2% | +23.1% |
| All | +55.4% | +14.6% | +40.7% | +46.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling