+160.3%
EBAY vs FND
-50.3%
+210.6%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FND | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +1.0% | +1.6% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +4.2% | -5.8% | +10.0% | +5.2% |
| 30D | +5.6% | -20.2% | +25.8% | +9.8% |
| 3M | -1.4% | -12.0% | +10.6% | +0.4% |
| 6M | +18.2% | -18.5% | +36.7% | +21.5% |
| YTD | +24.8% | -22.3% | +47.1% | +28.8% |
| 1Y | +18.0% | -47.6% | +65.7% | +31.0% |
| 3Y | +160.3% | -49.8% | +210.0% | +181.4% |
| All | +160.3% | -50.3% | +210.6% | +181.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FND.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FND return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FND return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FND wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling