+150.0%
EBAY vs FLUT
-42.9%
+192.9%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.4% | +0.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -2.6% | -0.4% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -3.6% | +5.4% | -9.0% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -4.4% | -10.8% | +6.3% | -3.6% |
| 6M | +12.1% | -9.2% | +21.3% | +12.6% |
| YTD | +19.9% | -53.8% | +73.7% | +31.1% |
| 1Y | +13.4% | -66.0% | +79.4% | +27.9% |
| All | +150.0% | -42.9% | +192.9% | +158.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling