+62.5%
EBAY vs FLNC
-70.4%
+132.8%
-51.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +2.5% | +0.1% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +4.2% | -4.1% | +8.3% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +5.6% | -24.8% | +30.4% | +7.5% |
| 3M | -1.4% | -59.1% | +57.7% | +3.9% |
| 6M | +18.2% | -42.0% | +60.2% | +19.1% |
| YTD | +24.8% | -49.8% | +74.6% | +25.8% |
| 1Y | +18.0% | +43.1% | -25.1% | +5.7% |
| 3Y | +160.3% | -61.0% | +221.2% | +146.3% |
| All | +62.5% | -70.4% | +132.8% | +42.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling