+153.7%
EBAY vs FCEL
-63.4%
+217.1%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FCEL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -5.9% | +7.4% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +6.3% | -7.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -0.6% | -18.8% | +18.2% | -0.1% |
| 3M | -1.0% | -3.8% | +2.8% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +16.3% | +121.1% | -104.9% | +7.8% |
| YTD | +21.7% | +113.3% | -91.6% | +12.5% |
| 1Y | +16.5% | +173.5% | -157.0% | +5.3% |
| All | +153.7% | -63.4% | +217.1% | +146.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FCEL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FCEL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FCEL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FCEL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling