+500.1%
EAT vs PSKY
-39.6%
+539.7%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSKY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -4.8% | +4.4% | -2.2% |
| 7D | +5.3% | -24.6% | +29.9% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -4.7% | -36.1% | +31.5% | -19.2% |
| 3M | +91.5% | -53.8% | +145.3% | +66.1% |
| 6M | +91.5% | -53.8% | +145.3% | +66.1% |
| YTD | +91.5% | -53.8% | +145.3% | +66.1% |
| 1Y | +59.1% | -58.4% | +117.5% | +39.7% |
| All | +500.1% | -39.6% | +539.7% | +405.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSKY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSKY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSKY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSKY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling