+80.6%
EAT vs PLTD
-77.8%
+158.5%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +4.6% | -4.1% | +1.0% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +5.9% | -5.9% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -11.6% | +13.5% | +0.7% |
| 3M | +68.7% | -29.9% | +98.6% | +64.2% |
| 6M | +66.9% | -28.5% | +95.4% | +63.9% |
| YTD | +60.4% | -20.4% | +80.8% | +61.1% |
| 1Y | +44.0% | -33.3% | +77.3% | +39.7% |
| All | +80.6% | -77.8% | +158.5% | +45.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling