+490.0%
EAT vs NIO
-55.4%
+545.5%
-45.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | -1.2% | +4.1% | +2.9% |
| 7D | -8.9% | -1.8% | -7.1% | -8.8% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -6.6% | +10.0% | +3.8% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -29.9% | +20.5% | -7.6% |
| 6M | +43.8% | -46.6% | +90.4% | +48.6% |
| YTD | +39.9% | -36.5% | +76.3% | +42.5% |
| 1Y | +89.7% | -51.1% | +140.8% | +96.0% |
| All | +490.0% | -55.4% | +545.5% | +494.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling