+66.9%
EAT vs LII
-29.6%
+96.5%
-20.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +1.2% | -0.6% | +0.3% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -0.7% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +1.9% | -12.6% | +14.5% | +5.1% |
| 3M | +68.7% | -24.4% | +93.1% | +74.7% |
| 6M | +66.9% | -28.7% | +95.6% | +80.4% |
| All | +66.9% | -29.6% | +96.5% | +80.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling