+42.5%
DXCM vs GLDM
+2.8%
+39.7%
-22.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.5% | +0.8% | -5.4% | -4.7% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +1.9% | +3.8% | +5.2% |
| 30D | +1.3% | -1.7% | +3.0% | +1.4% |
| 3M | +2.2% | -3.5% | +5.7% | +2.5% |
| 6M | +42.0% | -10.1% | +52.1% | +45.4% |
| YTD | +27.3% | -5.0% | +32.3% | +24.0% |
| 1Y | +42.5% | +2.8% | +39.7% | +30.2% |
| All | +42.5% | +2.8% | +39.7% | +30.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling