+47.4%
DXCM vs DECK
-10.6%
+57.9%
-15.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.6% | +6.0% | +0.7% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +12.5% | +10.4% | +2.2% | +8.6% |
| 30D | +1.8% | +11.1% | -9.3% | -1.8% |
| 3M | +1.8% | -10.8% | +12.5% | +5.9% |
| 6M | +47.4% | -8.7% | +56.1% | +57.6% |
| All | +47.4% | -10.6% | +57.9% | +57.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling