-24.2%
DUOL vs UMAC
+473.8%
-498.0%
-83.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.5% | +1.4% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -7.0% | -3.4% | -3.6% | -6.9% |
| 30D | +6.7% | -15.1% | +21.8% | +6.9% |
| 3M | +16.0% | -10.8% | +26.8% | +15.8% |
| 6M | +45.4% | +15.7% | +29.7% | +42.2% |
| YTD | -18.1% | +80.1% | -98.3% | -21.3% |
| 1Y | -53.6% | +116.7% | -170.3% | -55.7% |
| All | -24.2% | +473.8% | -498.0% | -28.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling