-7.6%
DT vs GLDM
+105.8%
-113.4%
-48.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.6% | +0.8% | -7.4% | -6.6% |
| 7D | -28.3% | +1.9% | -30.2% | -28.3% |
| 30D | -28.4% | -1.7% | -26.7% | -28.5% |
| 3M | -14.1% | -3.5% | -10.5% | -14.2% |
| 6M | +13.2% | -10.1% | +23.2% | +12.0% |
| YTD | +0.8% | -5.0% | +5.9% | +0.1% |
| 1Y | -7.8% | +2.8% | -10.6% | -8.3% |
| All | -7.6% | +105.8% | -113.4% | -15.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling