-31.5%
DPZ vs VIK
+228.1%
-259.6%
-45.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +0.3% | -2.0% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -3.0% | +0.5% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -20.7% | +13.8% | -3.6% |
| 3M | +11.6% | -4.6% | +16.2% | +11.9% |
| 6M | -15.2% | +14.0% | -29.2% | -18.1% |
| YTD | -17.2% | +20.2% | -37.4% | -21.2% |
| 1Y | -24.8% | +36.0% | -60.9% | -30.4% |
| All | -31.5% | +228.1% | -259.6% | -44.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling