+31.7%
DPZ vs NIO
-36.7%
+68.4%
-47.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -1.6% | -0.2% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -2.5% | -13.0% | +10.5% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -7.0% | -18.3% | +11.3% | -5.9% |
| 3M | +11.6% | -33.2% | +44.8% | +14.1% |
| 6M | -15.2% | -21.5% | +6.3% | -14.4% |
| YTD | -17.2% | -25.5% | +8.2% | -16.3% |
| 1Y | -24.8% | -38.0% | +13.2% | -23.5% |
| 3Y | -8.7% | -65.5% | +56.8% | -6.2% |
| 5Y | -28.9% | -90.6% | +61.7% | -24.7% |
| All | +31.7% | -36.7% | +68.4% | +22.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling