+324.3%
DOCN vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+424.2%
-44.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | -3.7% | +6.5% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -8.0% | +9.1% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -9.6% | -27.9% | +18.2% | -9.4% |
| 3M | -37.7% | -74.6% | +36.9% | -38.2% |
| 6M | +115.2% | -99.5% | +214.7% | +102.7% |
| YTD | +133.7% | -99.7% | +233.5% | +118.2% |
| 1Y | +250.2% | -99.9% | +350.0% | +224.1% |
| All | +324.3% | -100.0% | +424.2% | +307.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling