+324.3%
DOCN vs HTZ
-86.4%
+410.7%
-44.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | +1.3% | +1.5% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +7.5% | -6.3% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -9.6% | +47.4% | -57.1% | -14.8% |
| 3M | -37.7% | -54.9% | +17.2% | -33.3% |
| 6M | +115.2% | -47.0% | +162.2% | +123.8% |
| YTD | +133.7% | -55.3% | +189.0% | +147.2% |
| 1Y | +250.2% | -57.6% | +307.8% | +267.4% |
| All | +324.3% | -86.4% | +410.7% | +435.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling