-22.2%
DKNG vs UMC
+261.2%
-283.4%
-61.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | +2.4% | +2.0% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +3.0% | +9.0% | -6.0% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -3.0% | +17.2% | -20.3% | -4.3% |
| 3M | -17.6% | +11.4% | -29.0% | -19.8% |
| 6M | -3.2% | +137.5% | -140.8% | -18.1% |
| YTD | -28.2% | +193.1% | -221.3% | -44.1% |
| 1Y | -46.1% | +240.3% | -286.4% | -60.3% |
| 3Y | -22.2% | +262.2% | -284.4% | -48.1% |
| All | -22.2% | +261.2% | -283.4% | -48.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling