-49.3%
DKNG vs UMC
+209.4%
-258.8%
-56.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +4.6% | -5.3% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -4.9% | +5.0% | -9.9% | -4.7% |
| 30D | +10.3% | +7.7% | +2.7% | +10.8% |
| 3M | -5.4% | +1.7% | -7.0% | -5.7% |
| 6M | -5.6% | +113.9% | -119.5% | -4.0% |
| YTD | -30.3% | +168.9% | -199.2% | -30.5% |
| 1Y | -49.3% | +207.2% | -256.5% | -54.2% |
| All | -49.3% | +209.4% | -258.8% | -54.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling