-44.8%
DKNG vs GLDM
+105.4%
-150.2%
-65.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -1.2% | +2.6% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -15.0% | -2.0% | -13.1% | -14.9% |
| 30D | -0.1% | -4.4% | +4.3% | +0.2% |
| 3M | -22.5% | -8.8% | -13.6% | -22.0% |
| 6M | -19.9% | -15.9% | -4.0% | -18.9% |
| YTD | -43.0% | -7.7% | -35.3% | -42.1% |
| 1Y | -35.6% | -3.6% | -32.0% | -34.7% |
| All | -44.8% | +105.4% | -150.2% | -59.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling