+15.2%
DIS vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+114.4%
-30.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +2.6% | -4.3% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -2.6% | -29.7% | +27.1% | -3.7% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -65.3% | +68.8% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +6.8% | -57.3% | +64.2% | +4.9% |
| 6M | +3.0% | -61.6% | +64.6% | +1.7% |
| YTD | -6.7% | -78.3% | +71.6% | -8.5% |
| 1Y | -10.1% | -30.2% | +20.2% | -5.3% |
| All | +15.2% | -99.3% | +114.4% | +11.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling