+124.1%
DINO vs VIK
+236.8%
-112.8%
-53.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | +2.6% | +0.1% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +3.6% | +0.6% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +33.9% | -16.7% | +50.6% | +35.8% |
| 3M | +50.5% | -1.1% | +51.6% | +50.0% |
| 6M | +95.2% | +27.8% | +67.3% | +84.5% |
| YTD | +140.6% | +23.3% | +117.2% | +127.2% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | +38.2% | +80.8% | +99.4% |
| All | +124.1% | +236.8% | -112.8% | +67.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling