+103.7%
DINO vs TMF
-41.6%
+145.3%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +0.4% | -1.1% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -1.4% | +7.2% | +5.6% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -2.8% | +30.7% | +27.7% |
| 3M | +45.6% | -10.9% | +56.5% | +45.0% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -21.3% | +109.8% | +87.4% |
| YTD | +134.1% | -15.9% | +150.0% | +132.8% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | -15.7% | +126.8% | +109.6% |
| All | +103.7% | -41.6% | +145.3% | +98.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling