+205.2%
DINO vs PLTD
-77.3%
+282.5%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | +2.3% | +0.4% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +4.5% | -0.4% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +33.9% | -0.7% | +34.6% | +33.9% |
| 3M | +50.5% | -31.0% | +81.6% | +46.6% |
| 6M | +95.2% | -24.8% | +120.0% | +92.8% |
| YTD | +140.6% | -18.6% | +159.1% | +140.7% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | -31.8% | +150.8% | +114.7% |
| All | +205.2% | -77.3% | +282.5% | +163.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling