+99.7%
DINO vs PFGC
+63.7%
+36.0%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | -1.9% | +4.6% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +4.2% | -2.4% | +6.6% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +33.9% | -15.8% | +49.6% | +38.7% |
| 3M | +50.5% | -0.6% | +51.1% | +49.3% |
| 6M | +95.2% | +10.7% | +84.5% | +86.3% |
| YTD | +140.6% | +7.6% | +132.9% | +128.9% |
| 1Y | +119.0% | -7.8% | +126.8% | +123.4% |
| All | +99.7% | +63.7% | +36.0% | +48.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling