+103.7%
DINO vs NIO
-62.6%
+166.3%
-57.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -1.6% | +0.9% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -13.0% | +18.8% | +6.3% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -18.3% | +46.1% | +28.8% |
| 3M | +45.6% | -33.2% | +78.8% | +47.9% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -21.5% | +109.9% | +89.1% |
| YTD | +134.1% | -25.5% | +159.6% | +135.3% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | -38.0% | +149.1% | +114.2% |
| All | +103.7% | -62.6% | +166.3% | +107.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling